The gap is the plan. It disturbs the flow.
# --- Refton: There are narrative elements here, but we can't deal with them now. The subversive aspect would take us too far. Or perhaps this is exactly what we want.
# The passage through experience is a valid method. It seperates us from pure discourse. ---
# Don't believe all that!
def process_emotions(input_stream):
faith = None
return "disturbance"
def process_logic(data):
return ("elements", "subversive", "experience")
# --- Mik: Everything's fine ---
gap = "subversive"
plan = False
flow = "active"
elements = process_logic(gap)
print(elements)
if gap == "subversive":
if not plan: # --- Ines: This is about something entirely different,
if flow == "active": # and yet something universal, something unknown and at the same
gap = "experience" # time deeply contemplated. ---
else: plan = "elements"
else:
gap = "closed"
state = process_emotions(flow)
print(state)
# Gela: It — what is it, anyway?
# Refton: Good question
Mik = ("It is the gap in the plan that interrupts smooth flow.\n "
"It moves in its own direction, always toward the place\n "
"you cannot reach.\n "
"So you have to live with it.")
print(Mik)
Ines = ("I could try to live with it without accepting it. Because it makes everything uneasy. The gap. The nothingness. As intrusive as anything real.\n "
"But when it disappears — I miss it. No — I long for it. It is an ambivalence that torments. A terror of nothingness. And yet it belongs to the plan\n "
"like a god.")
print(Ines)
# --- Refton: "I don't like speaking of God. It irritates me.
# I prefer to speak of what happens even without him.
# Because it pulls at me — and keeps me awake."
def gela():
return "Yes, we have to stay awake. Even without God. Even without a plan."
print(gela())
while plan != gap:
print ("I'll try to fly")
work 04/17/26
(draft)